View source for VII PERSONALITIES OF THE MEXICAN PROBLEM

<p align="right">
[[Main Page | WWI Document Archive]] > [[Diaries, Memorials, Personal Reminiscences]] > [[The_Life_and_Letters_of_Walter_H._Page|Walter H. Page]] > '''Chapter VII'''
</p><hr>


<CENTER><FONT SIZE="+2">CHAPTER VII</FONT></center><br><br>

<CENTER><FONT SIZE="+2">PERSONALITIES OF THE MEXICAN PROBLEM</FONT></center>

<br><br>PAGE'S remarks about the &quot;trouble in Mexico City&quot;
and the &quot;remaining task&quot; refer, of course, to Sir Lionel
Carden. &quot;As I make Carden out,&quot; he wrote about this
time, &quot;he's a slow-minded, unimaginative, commercial Briton,
with as much nimbleness as an elephant. British commerce is his
deity, British advantage his duty and mission; and he goes about
his work with blunt dullness and ineptitude. That's his mental
calibre as I read him---a dull, commercial man.&quot;

<br><br>Although Sir Lionel Carden had been compelled to harmonize
himself with the American policy, Page regarded his continued
presence in Mexico City as a standing menace to British-American
relations. He therefore set himself to accomplish the minister's
removal. The failure of President Taft's attempt to obtain Carden's
transfer from Havana, in 1912, showed that Page's new enterprise
was a delicate and difficult one; yet he did not hesitate.

<br><br>The part that the wives of diplomats and statesmen play in
international relations is one that few Americans understand.
Yet in London, the Ambassador's wife is almost as important a
person as the Ambassador himself. An event which now took place
in the American Embassy emphasized this point. A certain lady,
well known in London, called upon Mrs. Page and gave her a message
on Mexican affairs for the Ambassador's benefit. The purport was
that the activities of certain British commercial interests in
Mexico, if not checked, would produce a serious situation between
Great Britain and the United States. The lady in question was
herself a sincere worker for Anglo-American amity, and this was
the motive that led her to take an unusual step.

<br><br>&quot;It's all being done for the benefit of one man,&quot;
she said.

<br><br>The facts were presented in the form of a memorandum, which
Mrs. Page copied and gave the Ambassador. This, in turn, Page
sent to President Wilson.

<br><br>.

<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <P ALIGN=CENTER><I><FONT SIZE="+1">To Edward M. House</FONT></I>
  <br><br>London, November 26, 1913.
  <br><br>DEAR HOUSE:
  <br><br>Won't you read the enclosed and get it to the President? It
  is somewhat extra-official but it is very confidential, and I
  have a special reason for wishing it to go through your hands.
  Perhaps it will interest you.
  <br><br>The lady that wrote it is one of the very best-informed women
  I know, one of those active and most influential women in the
  high political society of this Kingdom, at whose table statesmen
  and diplomats meet and important things come to pass. . . .
  <br><br>I am sure she has no motive but the avowed one. She has taken
  a liking to Mrs. Page and this is merely a friendly and patriotic
  act.
  <br><br>I had heard most of the things before as gossip---never before
  as here put together by a responsible hand.
  <br><br>Mrs. Page went to see her and, as evidence of our appreciation
  and safety, gave the original back to her. We have kept no copy,
  and I wish this burned, if you please. It would raise a riot
  here, if any breath of it were to get out, that would put bedlam
  to shame.
  <br><br>Lord Cowdray has been to see me for four successive days.
  I have a suspicion (though I don't know) that, instead of his
  running the Government, the Government has now turned the tables
  and is running him. His government contract is becoming a bad
  thing to sleep with. He told me this morning that he (through
  Lord Murray) had withdrawn the request for any concession in
  Colombia.(<ref>This was another manifestation of British friendliness. When the American excitement was most acute, it become known that British capitalists had secured oil concessions in Colombia. At the demand of the British G</ref>)
  I congratulated him. &quot;That, Lord Cowdray, will save you
  as well as some other people I know a good deal of possible trouble.&quot;
  I have explained to him the whole New Principle <I>in extenso,
  </I>&quot;so that you may see clearly where the line of danger
  runs.&quot; Lord! how he's changed! Several weeks ago when I
  ran across him accidentally he was humorous, almost cynical.
  Now he's very serious. I explained to him that the only thing
  that had kept South America from being parcelled out as Africa
  has been is the Monroe Doctrine and the United States behind
  it. He granted that.
  <br><br>&quot;In Monroe's time,&quot; said I, &quot;the only way to
  take a part of South America was to take land. Now finance has
  new ways of its own.&quot;
  <br><br>&quot;Perhaps,&quot; said he.
  <br><br>&quot;Right there,&quot; I answered, &quot;where you put your
  'perhaps,' I put a danger signal. That, I assure you, you will
  read about in the histories as 'The Wilson Doctrine'!&quot;
  <br><br>You don't know how easy it all is with our friend and leader
  in command. I've almost grown bold. You feel steady ground beneath
  you. They are taking to their tents.
  <br><br>&quot;What's going to happen in Mexico City?&quot;
  <br><br>&quot;A peaceful tragedy, followed by emancipation.&quot;
  <br><br>&quot;And the great industries of Mexico?&quot;
  <br><br>&quot;They will not have to depend on adventurers' favours!&quot;
  <br><br>&quot;But in the meantime, what?&quot;
  <br><br>&quot;Patience, looking towards justice!&quot;
  <BLOCKQUOTE>
    <br><br>Yours heartily and in health (you bet!)
    <br><br>W. H. P.</BLOCKQUOTE>
  <br><br>.
<P ALIGN=CENTER><I><FONT SIZE="+1">From Edward M. House</FONT></I>
<br><br>145 East 35th Street,<BR>
New York City.<BR>
December 12, 1913.
<br><br>DEAR PAGE:
<br><br>Your budget under dates, November 15th, 23rd, and 26th came
to me last week, just after the President had been here. I saved
the letters until I went to Washington, from which place I have
just returned.
<br><br>The President has been in bed for nearly a week and Doctor
Grayson permitted no one to see him but me. Yesterday before
I left he was feeling so well that I asked him if he did not
want to feel better and then I read him your letters. Mrs. Wilson
was present.
<br><br>I cannot tell you how pleased he was. He laughed repeatedly
at the different comments you made and he was delighted with
what you had to say concerning Lord Cowdray. We do not love him
for we think that between Cowdray and Carden a large part of
our troubles in Mexico has been made. Your description of his
attitude at the beginning and his present one pleased us much.
<br><br>After I had read the confidential letter the President said
&quot;now let me see if I have the facts.&quot; He then recited
them in consecutive order just as the English lady had written
them, almost using the same phrases, showing the well-trained
mind that he has. I then dropped the letter in the grate.
<br><br>He enjoyed heartily the expression &quot;Washington is a deep
hole of silence towards ambassadors,&quot; and again &quot;The
volume of silence that I get is oppressive,&quot; and of course
the story apropos of this last remark.
<br><br>I was with him for more than an hour and he was distinctly
better when I left. I hated to look at him in bed for I could
not help realizing what his life means to the Democratic Party,
to the Nation and almost to the world.
<br><br>Of course you know that I only read your letters to him. Mr.
Bryan was my guest on Wednesday and I returned to Washington
with him but I made no mention of our correspondence and I never
have. The President seems to like our way of doing things and
further than that I do not care.
<br><br>Upon my soul I do not believe the President could be better
pleased than he is with the work you are doing.
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<br><br>Faithfully yours,
<br><br>E. M. HOUSE.</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>

<br><br>.

<br><br>From now on the Ambassador exerted a round-about pressure---the
method of &quot;gradual approach&quot; already referred to---upon
the Foreign Office for Carden's removal. An extract from a letter
to the President gives a hint concerning this method:

<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <br><br>I have already worked upon Sir Edward's mind about his Minister
  to Mexico as far as I could. Now that the other matter is settled
  and while Carden is behaving, I go at it. Two years ago Mr. Knox
  made a bad blunder in protesting against Carden's &quot;anti-Americanism&quot;
  in Cuba. Mr. Knox sent Mr. Reid no definite facts nor even accusations
  to base a protest on. The result was a failure ---a bad failure.
  I have again asked Mr. Bryan for all the definite reports he
  has heard about Carden. That man, in my judgment, has caused
  nine tenths of the trouble here.
  <br><br>Naturally Page did not ask the Minister's removal directly---that
  would have been an unpardonable blunder. His meetings during
  this period with Sir Edward were taking place almost every day,
  and Carden, in one way or another, kept coming to the front in
  their conversation. Sir Edward, like Page, would sacrifice much
  in the cause of Anglo-American relations; Page would occasionally
  express his regret that the British Minister to Mexico was not
  a man who shared their enthusiasm on this subject; in numerous
  other ways the impression was conveyed that the two countries
  could solve the Mexican entanglement much better if a more congenial
  person represented British interests in the Southern Republic.
  This reasoning evidently produced the desired results. In early
  January, 1914, a hint was unofficially conveyed to the American
  Ambassador that Carden was to be summoned to London for a &quot;conversation&quot;
  with Sir Edward Grey, and that his return to Mexico would depend
  upon the outcome of that interview. There was a likelihood that,
  in future, Sir Lionel. Carden would represent the British Empire
  in Brazil.
  <br><br>This news, sent in discreet cipher to Washington, delighted
  the Administration. &quot;It is fine about Carden,&quot; wrote
  Colonel House on January 10th. &quot; I knew you had done it
  when I saw it in the papers, but I did not know just how. You
  could not have brought it about in a more diplomatic and effectual
  way.&quot;</BLOCKQUOTE>

<br><br>And the following came from the President:

<br><br>&nbsp;

<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <P ALIGN=CENTER><I><FONT SIZE="+1">From President Wilson</FONT></I>
  <br><br>Pass Christian,<BR>
  January 6, 1914.
  <br><br>MY DEAR PAGE:
  <br><br>I have your letter of December twenty-first, which I have
  greatly enjoyed.
  <br><br>Almost at the very time I was reading it, the report came
  through the Associated Press from London that Carden was to be
  transferred immediately to Brazil. If this is true, it is indeed
  a most fortunate thing and I feel sure it is to be ascribed to
  your tactful and yet very plain representations to Sir Edward
  Grey. I do not think you realize how hard we worked to get from
  either Lind or O'Shaughnessy(<A NAME="n39"></A><A HREF="Pagenotes.htm#39">39</A>)
  definite items of speech or conduct which we could furnish you
  as material for what you had to say to the Ministers about Carden.
  It simply was not obtainable. Everything that we got was at second
  or third hand. That he was working against us was too plain for
  denial, and yet he seems to have done it in a very astute way
  which nobody could take direct hold of. I congratulate you with
  all my heart on his transference.
  <br><br>I long, as you do, for an opportunity to do constructive work
  all along the line in our foreign relations, particularly with
  Great Britain and the Latin-American states, but surely, my dear
  fellow, you are deceiving yourself in supposing that constructive
  work is not now actually going on, and going on at your hands
  quite as much as at ours. The change of attitude and the growing
  ability to understand what we are thinking about and purposing
  on the part of the official circle in London is directly attributable
  to what you have been doing, and I feel more and more grateful
  every day that you are our spokesman and interpreter there. This
  is the only possible constructive work in foreign affairs, aside
  from definite acts of policy.
  <br><br>So far as the policy is concerned, you may be sure I will
  strive to the utmost to obtain both a repeal of the discrimination
  in the matter of tolls and a renewal of the arbitration treaties,
  and I am not without hope that I can accomplish both at this
  session. Indeed this is the session in which these things must
  be done if they are to be done at all.
  <br><br>Back of the smile which came to my face when you spoke of
  the impenetrable silence of the State Department toward its foreign
  representatives lay thoughts of very serious concern. We must
  certainly manage to keep our foreign representatives properly
  informed. The real trouble is to conduct genuinely confidential
  correspondence except through private letters, but surely the
  thing can be changed and it will be if I can manage it.
  <br><br>We are deeply indebted to you for your kindness and generous
  hospitality to our young folks(<A NAME="n40"></A><A HREF="Pagenotes.htm#40">40</A>)
  and we have learned with delight through your letters and theirs
  of their happy days in England.
  <br><br>With deep regard and appreciation,
  <BLOCKQUOTE>
    <br><br>Cordially and faithfully yours,
    <br><br>WOODROW WILSON.</BLOCKQUOTE>
  <br><br>HON. WALTER H. PAGE,<BR>
  American Embassy,<BR>
  London, England.</BLOCKQUOTE>

<br><br>Yet for the American Ambassador the experience was not one
of unmixed satisfaction. These letters have contained references
to the demoralized condition of the State Department under Mr.
Bryan and the succeeding ones will contain more; the Carden episode
portrayed the stupidity and ignorance of that Department at their
worst. By commanding Carden to cease his anti-American tactics
and to support the American policy the Foreign Office had performed
an act of the utmost courtesy and consideration to this country.
By quietly &quot;promoting&quot; the same minister to another
sphere, several thousand miles away from Mexico and Washington,
it was now preparing to eliminate all possible causes of friction
between the two countries. The British, that is, had met the wishes
of the United States in the two great matters that were then making
serious trouble---Huerta and Carden. Yet no government, Great
Britain least of all, wishes to be placed in the position of moving
its diplomats about at the request of another Power. The whole
deplorable story appears in the following letter.

<br><br>.

<BLOCKQUOTE>
<P ALIGN=CENTER><I><FONT SIZE="+1">To Edward M. House</FONT></I>
<br><br>January 8th, 1914.
<br><br>MY DEAR HOUSE:
<br><br>Two days ago I sent a telegram to the Department saying that
I had information from a private, <I>unofficial </I>source that
the report that Carden would be transferred was true, and from
another source that Marling would succeed him. The Government
here has given out nothing. I know nothing from official sources.
Of course the only decent thing to do at Washington was to sit
still till this Government should see fit to make an announcement.
But what do they do? Give my telegram to the press! It appears
here almost verbatim in this morning's <I>Mail.</I>---I have
to make an humiliating explanation to the Foreign Office. This
is the third time I've had to make such an humiliating explanation
to Sir Edward. It's getting a little monotonous. He's getting
tired, and so am I. They now deny at the Foreign Office that
anything has been decided about Carden, and this meddling by
us (as they look at it) will surely cause a delay and may even
cause a change of purpose.
<br><br>That's the practical result of their leaking at Washington.
On a previous occasion they leaked the same way. When I telegraphed
a remonstrance, they telegraphed back to me that the leak had
been <I>here! </I>That was the end of it-except that I had to
explain to Sir Edward the best I could. And about a lesser matter,
I did the same thing a third time, in a conversation. Three times
this sort of thing has happened.---On the other hand, the King's
Master of Ceremonies called on me on the President's Birthday
and requested for His Majesty that I send His Majesty's congratulations.
Just ten days passed before a telegraphic answer came! The very
hour it came, I was myself making up an answer for the President
that I was going to send, to save our face.
<br><br>Now, I'm trying with all my might to do this job. I spend
all my time, all my ingenuity, all my money at it. I have organized
my staff as a sort of Cabinet. We meet every day. We go over
everything conceivable that we may do or try to do. We do good
team work. I am not sure but I doubt whether these secretaries
have before been taken into just such a relation to their chief.
They are enthusiastic and ambitious and industrious and---safe.
There's no possibility of any leak. We arrange our dinners with
reference to the possibility of getting information and of carrying
points. Mrs. Page gives and accepts invitations with the same
end in view. We're on the job to the very limit of our abilities.
<br><br>And I've got the Foreign Office in such a relation that they
are frank and friendly. (I can't keep 'em so, if this sort of
thing goes on.)
<br><br>Now the State Department seems (as it touches us) to be utterly
chaotic---silent when it ought to respond, loquacious when it
ought to be silent. There are questions that I have put to it
at this Government's request to which I can get no answer.
<br><br>It's hard to keep my staff enthusiastic under these conditions.
When I reached the Chancery this morning, they were in my room,
with all the morning papers marked, on the table, eagerly discussing
what we ought to do about this publication of my dispatch. The
enthusiasm and buoyancy were all gone out of them. By their looks
they said, Oh I what's the use of our bestirring ourselves to
send news to Washington when they use it to embarrass us?&quot;---While
we are thus at work, the only two communications from the Department
to-day are two letters from two of the Secretaries about---presenting
&quot; Democratic&quot; ladies from Texas and Oklahoma at court!
And Bryan is now lecturing in Kansas.
<br><br>Since I began to write this letter, Lord Cowdray came here
to the house and stayed two and a half hours, talking about possible
joint intervention in Mexico. Possibly he came from the Foreign
Office. I don't know whether to dare send a despatch to the State
Department, telling what he told me, for fear they'd leak. And
to leak this---Good Lord! Two of the Secretaries were here to
dinner, and I asked them if I should send such a despatch. They
both answered instantly: &quot;No, sir, don't dare: <I>write
</I>it to the President.&quot; I said: &quot;No, I have no right
to bother the President with regular business nor with frequent
letters.&quot; To that they agreed; but the interesting and somewhat
appalling thing is, they're actually afraid to have a confidential
despatch go to the State Department.
<br><br>I see nothing to do but to suggest to the President to put
somebody in the Department who will stay there and give intelligent
attention to the diplomatic telegrams and letters---some conscientious
assistant or clerk. For I hear mutterings, somewhat like these
mutterings of mine, from some of the continental embassies.---The
whole thing is disorganizing and demoralizing beyond description.
<br><br>All these and more are my troubles. I'll take care of them.
But remember what I am going to write on the next sheet. For
here may come a trouble for you:
<br><br>Mrs. Page has learned something more about Secretary Bryan's
proposed visit here in the spring. He's coming to talk his peace
plan which, you know, is a sort of grape-juice arbitration---a
distinct step backward from a real arbitration treaty. Well,
if he comes with that, when you come to talk about reducing armaments,
you'll wish you'd never been born. Get your ingenuity together,
then, and prevent that visit.(<A NAME="n41"></A><A HREF="Pagenotes.htm#41">41</A>)
<br><br>Not the least funny thing in the world is---Senator X turned
up to-day. As he danced around the room begging everybody's pardon
(nobody knew what for) he, complimented everybody in sight, explained
the forged letter, dilated on state politics, set the Irish question
on the right end, cleared Bacon(<A NAME="n42"></A><A HREF="Pagenotes.htm#42">42</A>)
of all hostility to me, declined tea because he had insomnia
and explained just how it works to keep you awake, danced more
and declared himself happy and bowed himself out---well pleased.
He's as funny a cuss as I've seen in many a day. Lord Cowdray,
who was telling Mexican woes to Katharine in the corner, looked
  up and asked, &quot;Who's the little dancing gentleman?&quot;
  Suppose X had known he was dancing for---Lord Cowdray's amusement,
  what do y' suppose he'd 've thought? There are some strange combinations
  in our house on Mrs. Page's days at home. Cowdray has, I am sure,
  lost (that is, failed to make) a hundred million dollars that
  he had within easy reach by this Wilson Doctrine, but he's game.
  He doesn't lie awake. He's a dead-game sport, and he knows he's
  knocked out in that quarter and he doesn't squeal. His experiences
  will serve us many a good turn in the future---as a warning.
  I rather like him. He eats out of my hand in the afternoon and
  has one of his papers jump on me in the morning. Some time in
  the twenty-four hours, he must attain about the normal temperature---say
  about noon. He admires the President greatly---sincerely. Force
  meets force, you see. With the President behind me I could really
  enjoy Cowdray centuries after X had danced himself into oblivion.
  <br><br>By the way, Cowdray said to me to-day: &quot;Whatever the
  United States and Great Britain agree on the world must do.&quot;
  He's right. (1) The President must come here, perhaps in his
  second term; (2) these two Governments must enter a compact for
  peace and for gradual disarmament. Then we can go about our business
  for (say) a hundred years.
  <BLOCKQUOTE>
    <br><br>Heartily,
    <br><br>W. H. P.</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>

<br><br>In spite of the continued pressure of the United States and
the passive support of its anti-Huerta policy by Great Britain,
the Mexican usurper refused to resign. President Wilson now began
to espouse the interests of Villa and Carranza. His letters to
Page indicate that he took these men at their own valuation, believed
that they were sincere patriots working for the cause of &quot;democracy&quot;
and &quot;constitutionalism&quot; and that their triumph would
usher in a day of enlightenment and progress for Mexico. It was
the opinion of the Foreign Office that Villa and Carranza were
worse men than Huerta and that any recognition of their revolutionary
activities would represent no moral gain.

<br><br>.

<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <P ALIGN=CENTER><I><FONT SIZE="+1">From the President</FONT></I>
  <br><br>The White House, Washington,<BR>
  May 18,1914.
  <br><br>MY DEAR PAGE:
  <br><br>. . . As to the attitude of mind on that side of the water
  toward the Constitutionalists, it is based upon prejudices which
  cannot be sustained by the facts. I am enclosing a copy of an
  interview by a Mr. Reid(<A NAME="n43"></A><A HREF="Pagenotes.htm#43">43</A>)
  which appeared in one of the afternoon papers recently and which
  sums up as well as they could be summed up my own conclusions
  with regard to the issues and the personnel of the pending contest
  in Mexico. I can verify it from a hundred different sources,
  most of them sources not in the least touched by predilections
  for such men as our friends in London have supposed Carranza
  and Villa to be.
  <BLOCKQUOTE>
    <br><br>Cordially and faithfully yours,
    <br><br>WOODROW WILSON.</BLOCKQUOTE>
  <br><br>HON. WALTER H. PAGE,<BR>
  U. S. Embassy,<BR>
  London, England.
  <br><br>.
<br><br>The White House, Washington,<BR>
June 1, 1914.
<br><br>MY DEAR PAGE:
<br><br>. . . The fundamental thing is that they (British critics
of Villa) are all radically mistaken. There has been less disorder
and less danger to life where the Constitutionalists have gained
control than there has been where Huerta is in control. I should
think that if they are getting correct advices from Tampico,
people in England would be very much enlightened by what has
happened there. Before the Constitutionalists took the place
there was constant danger to the oil properties and to foreign
residents. Now there is no danger and the men who felt obliged
to leave the oil wells to their Mexican employees are returning,
to find, by the way, that their Mexican employees guarded them
most faithfully without wages, and in some instances almost without
food. I am told that the Constitutionalists cheered the American
flag when they entered Tampico.
<br><br>I believe that Mexico City will be much quieter and a much
safer place to live in after the Constitutionalists get there
than it is now. The men who are approaching and are sure to reach
it are much less savage and much more capable of government than
Huerta.
<br><br>These, I need not tell you, are not fancies of mine but conclusions
I have drawn from facts which are at last becoming very plain
and palpable, at least to us on this side of the water. If they
are not becoming plain in Great Britain, it is because their
papers are not serving them with the truth. Our own papers were
prejudiced enough in all conscience against Villa and Carranza
and everything that was happening in the north of Mexico, but
at last the light is dawning on them in spite of themselves and
they are beginning to see things as they really are. I would
be as nervous and impatient as your friends in London are if
I feared the same things that they fear, but I do not. I am convinced
that even Zapata would restrain his followers and leave, at any
rate, all foreigners and all foreign property untouched if he
were the first to enter Mexico City.
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<br><br>Cordially and faithfully yours,
<br><br>WOODROW WILSON.</BLOCKQUOTE>
<br><br>HON. WALTER H. PAGE,<BR>
American Embassy,<BR>
London, England.</BLOCKQUOTE>

<br><br>On this issue, however, the President and his Ambassador to
Great Britain permanently disagreed. The events which took place
in April, 1914---the insult to the American flag at Tampico, the
bombardment and capture of Vera Cruz by American forces---made
stronger Page's conviction, already set forth in this correspondence,
that there was only one solution of the Mexican problem.

<br><br>.

<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <P ALIGN=CENTER><I><FONT SIZE="+1">To Edward M. House</FONT></I>
  <br><br>April 27, 1914.
  <br><br>DEAR HOUSE:
  <br><br>. . . And, as for war with Mexico---I confess I've had a continually
  growing fear of it for six months. I've no confidence in the
  Mexican leaders---none of 'em. We shall have to Cuba-ize the
  country, which means thrashing 'em first---I fear, I fear, I
  fear; and I feel sorry for us all, the President in particular.
  It's inexpressibly hard fortune for him. I can't tell you with
  what eager fear we look for despatches every day and twice a
  day hurry to get the newspapers. All England believes we've got
  to fight it out.
  <br><br>Well, the English are with us, you see. Admiral Cradock, I
  understand, does not approve our policy, but he stands firmly
  with us whatever we do. The word to stand firmly with us has,
  I am very sure, been passed along the whole line---naval, newspaper,
  financial, diplomatic. Carden won't give us any more trouble
  during the rest of his stay in Mexico. The yellow press's abuse
  of the President and me has actually helped us here.
  <BLOCKQUOTE>
    <br><br>Heartily yours,
    <br><br>W. H. P.</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>

<hr>

<references/>


<p align="right">
[[Main Page | WWI Document Archive]] > [[Diaries, Memorials, Personal Reminiscences]] > [[The_Life_and_Letters_of_Walter_H._Page|Walter H. Page]] > '''Chapter VII'''
</p><hr>